ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs Arc A580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A580 and Radeon X1650 SE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A580
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
31.00
+17122%

Arc A580 outperforms ATI X1650 SE by a whopping 17122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1821403
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Power efficiency12.220.46
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameDG2-512RV515
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1700 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,700 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate384.02.540
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs1924
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.01x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A580 31.00
+17122%
ATI X1650 SE 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A580 11916
+16683%
ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1030−1
1440p55-0−1
4K33-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 98 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 83 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 258
+25700%
1−2
−25700%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85 0−1
Metro Exodus 134 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 74 0−1
Dota 2 86 0−1
Far Cry 5 63 0−1
Fortnite 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 214
+21300%
1−2
−21300%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 86 0−1
Metro Exodus 97 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17800%
1−2
−17800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280
+27400%
1−2
−27400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 67 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 177
+17600%
1−2
−17600%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17800%
1−2
−17800%
Valorant 120−130 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 37 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17400%
1−2
−17400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 0−1
World of Tanks 200−210
+19900%
1−2
−19900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 44 0−1
Far Cry 5 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 130 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 91 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55 0−1
Valorant 85−90 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 19 0−1
Dota 2 38 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 38 0−1
Metro Exodus 37 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−33 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 73 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.00 0.18
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 27 Watt

Arc A580 has a 17122.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has 548.1% lower power consumption.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 SE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 335 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.