ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs Arc A370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M with Radeon X1650 SE, including specs and performance data.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
11.57
+7131%

A370M outperforms X1650 SE by a whopping 7131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4371461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.700.48
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameDG2-128RV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed300 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate99.202.540
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644
Ray Tracing Cores8no data
L1 Cache1.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A370M 11.57
+7131%
ATI X1650 SE 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
+7104%
Samples: 2
ATI X1650 SE 71
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD390−1
1440p20-0−1
4K34-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 46 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 43 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 37 0−1
Far Cry 5 49 0−1
Fortnite 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+10800%
1−2
−10800%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+8700%
2−3
−8700%
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Dota 2 68 0−1
Far Cry 5 46 0−1
Fortnite 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 29 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 20 0−1
Metro Exodus 34 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+10800%
1−2
−10800%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21 0−1
Dota 2 66 0−1
Far Cry 5 43 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 13 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+10800%
1−2
−10800%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+9200%
1−2
−9200%
Grand Theft Auto V 11 0−1
Metro Exodus 20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Valorant 130−140
+13100%
1−2
−13100%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 29 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 65−70 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 40 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.57 0.16
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Arc A370M has a 7131.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A370M or Radeon X1650 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.