GeForce MX150 GP107 vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking369not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe HPG (2022−2023)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameAlchemistGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)23 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6384
Core clock speed1150 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1532 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)25 Watt
Texture fill rate55.2036.77
Floating-point performance1.766 gflops1.177 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 23 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

MX150 GP107, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and GeForce MX150 GP107. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107
GeForce MX150 GP107

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 55 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 GP107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.