GeForce 9200 vs Arc A350M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.66no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameDG2-128C79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate55.203.600
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs488
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.64.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 6 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 40 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and GeForce 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook card while GeForce 9200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.