FirePro V7900 SDI vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking369not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe HPG (2022−2023)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameAlchemistCayman
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)24 May 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61280
Core clock speed1150 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)224 Watt
Texture fill rate55.2058.00
Floating-point performance1.766 gflops1.856 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 224 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 540% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.