Quadro M2200 vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with Quadro M2200, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
18.14
+64.8%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro M2200 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking284394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.00
ArchitectureXe LPGMaxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUN17P-Q3
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)13 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current priceno data$1967

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speedno data694 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data66.30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Quadro M2200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5508 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.126
CUDAno data5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14
+64.8%
Quadro M2200 11.01

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro M2200 by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 12276
+66.5%
Quadro M2200 7372

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro M2200 by 67% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 43185
+75.4%
Quadro M2200 24622

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro M2200 by 75% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679
+48.4%
Quadro M2200 5850

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro M2200 by 48% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 42473
+12.4%
Quadro M2200 37796

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro M2200 by 12% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−7.5%
43
+7.5%
1440p16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
4K21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 37 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 33 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Far Cry 5 33 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Hitman 3 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 30−33 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 no data

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 no data
Battlefield 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 no data

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M2200 is 8% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 78% faster in 1440p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 62% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.14 11.01
Recency 14 December 2023 13 January 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 299 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.