Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUMontevina
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)1 October 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores810
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm65 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 42473
+29192%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm

Arc 8-Cores iGPU has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 59 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 205 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.