Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
16.66

RX 9060 XT 16 GB outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.38
Power efficiencyno data23.21
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)4 June 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data400.6
Floating-point processing powerno data25.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−186%
100−110
+186%
1440p17
−165%
45−50
+165%
4K14
−186%
40−45
+186%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.49
1440pno data7.76
4Kno data8.73

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
−170%
300−310
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40
−175%
110−120
+175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−188%
210−220
+188%
Counter-Strike 2 85
−182%
240−250
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Far Cry 5 39
−182%
110−120
+182%
Fortnite 90−95
−190%
270−280
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−182%
200−210
+182%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−181%
180−190
+181%
Valorant 130−140
−161%
350−400
+161%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−188%
210−220
+188%
Counter-Strike 2 42
−186%
120−130
+186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−176%
600−650
+176%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Far Cry 5 36
−178%
100−105
+178%
Fortnite 90−95
−190%
270−280
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−182%
200−210
+182%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−180%
70−75
+180%
Metro Exodus 28
−186%
80−85
+186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−181%
180−190
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
−192%
140−150
+192%
Valorant 130−140
−161%
350−400
+161%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−188%
210−220
+188%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Far Cry 5 34
−179%
95−100
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−182%
200−210
+182%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−181%
180−190
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−192%
70−75
+192%
Valorant 130−140
−161%
350−400
+161%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−190%
270−280
+190%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−178%
350−400
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−178%
450−500
+178%
Valorant 160−170
−168%
450−500
+168%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Far Cry 5 32
−181%
90−95
+181%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−167%
24−27
+167%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Valorant 95−100
−192%
280−290
+192%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and RX 9060 XT 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 186% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 165% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 186% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.66 48.78
Recency 14 December 2023 4 June 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 16 GB has a 192.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 81 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 193 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc 8-Core iGPU or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.