GeForce 710M vs Arc 7-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 7-Core iGPU and GeForce 710M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 7-Core iGPU
2023
17.56
+1388%

Arc 7-Core iGPU outperforms 710M by a whopping 1388% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3151070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.42
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGK208
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)24 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7192
Core clock speedno data719 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data915 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data11.50
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2761 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataDDR3
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 2560x1600
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 API
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 17.56
+1388%
GeForce 710M 1.18

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 11498
+939%
GeForce 710M 1107

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 37719
+713%
GeForce 710M 4641

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 8133
+958%
GeForce 710M 769

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 41031
+671%
GeForce 710M 5323

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+725%
8−9
−725%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Valorant 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Dota 2 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Fortnite 95−100
+2275%
4−5
−2275%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+575%
8−9
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+838%
12−14
−838%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+671%
7−8
−671%
Valorant 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
World of Tanks 210−220
+727%
24−27
−727%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+510%
10−11
−510%
Forza Horizon 4 44
+450%
8−9
−450%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+838%
12−14
−838%
Valorant 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+2214%
7−8
−2214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130
+1917%
6−7
−1917%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Valorant 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Dota 2 30−33
+100%
14−16
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+100%
14−16
−100%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+100%
14−16
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Fortnite 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
Valorant 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Arc 7-Core iGPU and GeForce 710M compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Core iGPU is 1650% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc 7-Core iGPU is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Core iGPU is ahead in 35 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.56 1.18
Recency 14 December 2023 24 July 2013
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Arc 7-Core iGPU has a 1388.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 710M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Arc 7-Core iGPU
NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GeForce 710M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 24 votes

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 681 vote

Rate GeForce 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.