Quadro P2000 vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

Contents

Share:
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.87
Power efficiencyno data17.84
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2026 (recently)6 February 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$585

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401024
Core clock speedno data1076 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data94.72
Floating-point processing powerno data3.031 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data5 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data140.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+80.4%
56
−80.4%
1440p57
+185%
20
−185%
4K36
+125%
16
−125%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.45
1440pno data29.25
4Kno data36.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Fortnite 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+0%
38
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
+0%
7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10
+0%
10
+0%

This is how Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro P2000 compete in popular games:

  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 80% faster in 1080p
  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 185% faster in 1440p
  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 125% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Recency 3 March 2026 6 February 2017

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 9 years.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro P2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU
M5 Max 40-Core GPU
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
GTX 980MX GeForce GTX 980MX
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
PRO V710 Radeon PRO V710
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
RTX 4050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
S9300 X2 FirePro S9300 X2
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 5 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 768 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Quadro P2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.