Quadro P1000 vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P1000 P2000 Mobile P2000 Max-Q P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P5000 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q

Contents

Share:
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.31
Power efficiencyno data20.71
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)7 February 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40640
Core clock speedno data1493 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1519 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.61
Floating-point processing powerno data1.555 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+149%
43
−149%
1440p60no data
4K38
+245%
11
−245%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.72
4Kno data34.09

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 149% faster in 1080p
  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 245% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Recency 3 March 2026 7 February 2017

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 9 years.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro P1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
R9 M370X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Instinct MI6 AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Instinct MI8 AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Pro WX 5100 AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Pro WX 4100 AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
S9300 X2 AMD FirePro S9300 X2
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P400 NVIDIA Quadro P400
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P600 NVIDIA Quadro P600
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P2000 NVIDIA Quadro P2000
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
M3000 SE NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P6000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.8 607 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 716 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Quadro P1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.