Quadro P5200 vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Contents

Share:
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.77
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402560
Core clock speedno data1556 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1746 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data279.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.94 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
L1 Cacheno data960 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data230.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
−12.1%
120
+12.1%
1440p60no data
4K38
−26.3%
48
+26.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro P5200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 12% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5200 is 26% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Recency 3 March 2026 21 February 2018

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 8 years.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro P5200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
HD 8830M Radeon HD 8830M
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
E9550 MXM Radeon E9550 MXM
P3000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Max-Q
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition AMD RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
RX Vega 64 Limited Edition AMD RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling AMD RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
RX Vega 64 Nano AMD RX Vega 64 Nano
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
Pro SSG AMD Pro SSG
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
P106-090 P106 090
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
UHD Graphics 620 Intel Graphics 620
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
HD Graphics 610 Intel Graphics 610
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.8 610 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 108 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Quadro P5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.