Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataEXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38384
Boost clock speedno data1058 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.86

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU and Quadro K2000M Embedded compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5-6400GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data3.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.0 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.1
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2023 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
M2 Max 38-Core GPU
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 181 vote

Rate Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.