UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Graphics 750 32EUs by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 428 | 744 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | no data | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (5 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
+75%
| 16
−75%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+243%
|
21−24
−243%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+211%
|
18
−211%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+243%
|
21−24
−243%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+253%
|
14−16
−253%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+200%
|
14
−200%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+226%
|
21−24
−226%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+189%
|
18−20
−189%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+107%
|
50−55
−107%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+250%
|
16
−250%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+243%
|
21−24
−243%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+155%
|
70−75
−155%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+150%
|
34
−150%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+253%
|
14−16
−253%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+223%
|
13
−223%
|
| Fortnite | 75−80
+226%
|
21−24
−226%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+189%
|
18−20
−189%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 45−50
+277%
|
13
−277%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+350%
|
6
−350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+183%
|
12−14
−183%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+107%
|
50−55
−107%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+273%
|
15
−273%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+174%
|
31
−174%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+253%
|
14−16
−253%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+250%
|
12
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+189%
|
18−20
−189%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+183%
|
12−14
−183%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+273%
|
30−33
−273%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+226%
|
21−24
−226%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+257%
|
7−8
−257%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+223%
|
30−33
−223%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+260%
|
30−33
−260%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+224%
|
40−45
−224%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+3400%
|
1−2
−3400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+225%
|
8−9
−225%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+66.7%
|
14−16
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+250%
|
20−22
−250%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+262%
|
12−14
−262%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 75% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 3400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Apple M1 8-Core GPU surpassed UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in all 44 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.66 | 3.93 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 222.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.
The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
