Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with Radeon Pro WX 4150, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.71
+96.7%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Pro WX 4150 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.58
Architectureno dataGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataBaffin
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)1 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8896
Core clock speed1278 MHz1002 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1053 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data58.97
Floating-point processing powerno data1.887 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+100%
14−16
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
Atomic Heart 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Atomic Heart 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+120%
20−22
−120%
Fortnite 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+86.2%
27−30
−86.2%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
Valorant 110−120
+54.2%
70−75
−54.2%
Atomic Heart 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+68.2%
100−110
−68.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Dota 2 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+120%
20−22
−120%
Fortnite 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+86.2%
27−30
−86.2%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Valorant 110−120
+54.2%
70−75
−54.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Dota 2 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+120%
20−22
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+86.2%
27−30
−86.2%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Valorant 110−120
+54.2%
70−75
−54.2%
Fortnite 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+92%
50−55
−92%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+177%
35−40
−177%
Valorant 130−140
+83.8%
70−75
−83.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Fortnite 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Atomic Heart 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Valorant 65−70
+109%
30−35
−109%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 45−50
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Fortnite 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Pro WX 4150 compete in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.71 6.97
Recency 10 November 2020 1 March 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 96.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
928 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or Radeon Pro WX 4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.