Radeon 540X vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon 540X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
14.08
+281%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Radeon 540X by a whopping 281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking347671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.01
Architectureno dataGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataLexa
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (3 years ago)12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$421

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed1278 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.47

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon 540X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+23.8%
21
−23.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+233%
9
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+275%
16
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+275%
12
−275%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+275%
16−18
−275%
Hitman 3 40−45
+264%
11
−264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+270%
23
−270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+268%
19
−268%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+270%
23
−270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+246%
13
−246%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+275%
12
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+275%
16−18
−275%
Hitman 3 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+275%
16
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+267%
15
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+275%
20
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+275%
16
−275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+275%
16−18
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+253%
17
−253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+250%
10
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+275%
12
−275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Hitman 3 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+275%
24−27
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+280%
24−27
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hitman 3 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon 540X compete in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 24% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.08 3.70
Recency 10 November 2020 12 August 2019
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

The Apple M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 540X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon 540X
Radeon 540X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 890 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 308 votes

Rate Radeon 540X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.