GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Place in performance ranking	347	177
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.82
Architecture	no data	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	no data	N18E-G1 TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	10 November 2020 (3 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	no data	$1250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	1920
Core clock speed	1278 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	80-90 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	144.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	6 GB
Memory bus width	no data	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	no data	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 14.07

RTX 2060 Mobile 29.39
+109%

GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200

RTX 2060 Mobile 411721
+46.9%

GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by 47% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	26 −304%	105 +304%
1440p	27−30 −130%	62 +130%
4K	18−20 −128%	41 +128%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−123%

45−50
+123%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −214%	91 +214%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −209%	71 +209%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −159%	119 +159%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −214%	88 +214%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −123%	45−50 +123%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −218%	105 +218%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −182%	110 +182%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −61.2%	108 +61.2%
Hitman 3	27−30 −207%	83 +207%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −161%	149 +161%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −177%	130 +177%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −156%	100 +156%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −239%	149 +239%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −87%	86 +87%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −148%	72 +148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −143%	56 +143%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −128%	105 +128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −182%	79 +182%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −123%	45−50 +123%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −158%	85 +158%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −110%	82 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −318%	280 +318%
Hitman 3	27−30 −141%	65 +141%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −244%	196 +244%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −106%	97 +106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −126%	88 +126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −180%	123 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −283%	111 +283%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −313%	190 +313%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −72.4%	50 +72.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −109%	48 +109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −107%	58 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −123%	45−50 +123%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −87.9%	62 +87.9%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −31.3%	88 +31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −64.9%	94 +64.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −143%	107 +143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −107%	60 +107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +21.1%	38 −21.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−103%

79
+103%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −141%	65 +141%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −208%	80 +208%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −186%	40 +186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −245%	38 +245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −247%	59 +247%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −174%	63 +174%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −119%	55−60 +119%
Hitman 3	16−18 −171%	46 +171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −141%	70 +141%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −133%	55−60 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −168%	65−70 +168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −171%	35−40 +171%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −211%	28 +211%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−170%

62
+170%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −129%	32 +129%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −200%	30 +200%
Hitman 3	10−11 −180%	28 +180%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −200%	39 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −214%	22 +214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −186%	20 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −163%	21 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −173%	41 +173%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −123%	27−30 +123%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −200%	15 +200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−131%

30
+131%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 304% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 130% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 128% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 21% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 318% faster.

All in all, in popular games: