GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
11.81
+532%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms GT 755M Mac Edition by a whopping 532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389874
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.98
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speed1278 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.72
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8333 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+600%
4−5
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Atomic Heart 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Atomic Heart 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+567%
27−30
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Dota 2 85−90
+608%
12−14
−608%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Dota 2 85−90
+608%
12−14
−608%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%
Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+581%
16−18
−581%
Valorant 130−140
+548%
21−24
−548%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Fortnite 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Atomic Heart 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Valorant 70−75
+600%
10−11
−600%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Fortnite 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GT 755M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 600% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.81 1.87
Recency 10 November 2020 8 November 2013
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 531.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
929 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4
10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.