Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated68
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.22
Power efficiencyno data13.36
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameR430Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2005 (19 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors160 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400413.0
ROPs1664
TMUs16160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed490 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth31.36 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2005 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 7 nm

RX 6750 GRE has an age advantage of 18 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X800 XL and Radeon RX 6750 GRE. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XL
All-In-Wonder X800 XL
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 210 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.