Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Xe LPG
GPU code nameR200Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 November 2001 (22 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$7.90 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed230 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate1.840no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed380 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.08 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112_2
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/Ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2001 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.