Radeon R7 A360 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated963
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV350Meso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2003 (21 year ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed400 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors60 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate1.60027.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2003 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

R7 A360 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO and Radeon R7 A360. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO is a desktop card while Radeon R7 A360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO
All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO
AMD Radeon R7 A360
Radeon R7 A360

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.