FireStream 9250 vs All-In-Wonder 9200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV280RV770
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 January 2004 (20 years ago)16 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed250 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors36 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00025.00
Floating-point performanceno data1,000.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1986 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 and FireStream 9250. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9200
All-In-Wonder 9200
AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.