GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1157
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.30
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV280GK107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (21 years ago)3 February 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed250 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors36 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data32 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00023.84
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed164 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.624 GB/s40 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 3 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

GT 640M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 SE and GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 SE or GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.