GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated290
Place by popularitynot in top-10036
Power efficiencyno data22.22
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR360GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed412 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.29667.65
Floating-point processing powerno data4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed344 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.02 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Mobile has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9800 X2-256T and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9800 X2-256T is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T
FireGL 9800 X2-256T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 5315 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9800 X2-256T or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.