ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1157not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.30no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK107RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 February 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed745 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate23.840.8
Floating-point processing power0.5722 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 February 2013 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 28 Watt

GT 640M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE PCI, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and Radeon 9200 SE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Radeon 9200 SE PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 SE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition or Radeon 9200 SE PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.