Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 LE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRV280Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (20 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors36 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate1.000no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed166 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112_2
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 LE and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 LE is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 LE
All-In-Wonder 9200 LE
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.