Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile vs A800 PCIe 80 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA100Renoir
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 November 2022 (1 year ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912320
Boost clock speed1410 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate609.128.00
Floating-point performance19.49 gflops0.896 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount80 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,935 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2022 6 January 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

A800 PCIe 80 GB has an age advantage of 2 years.

Graphics 320SP Mobile, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A800 PCIe 80 GB and Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A800 PCIe 80 GB is a desktop card while Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
A800 PCIe 80 GB
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.