Radeon RX 7800M vs A10G

Place in the ranking	181	130
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.65	16.46
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2025)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code name	GA102	Navi 32
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	12 April 2021 (4 years ago)	11 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9216	3840
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	2335 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	492.5	560.4
Floating-point processing power	31.52 TFLOPS	35.87 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	288	240
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	60
L0 Cache	no data	960 KB
L1 Cache	9 MB	768 KB
L2 Cache	6 MB	4 MB
L3 Cache	no data	48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1563 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	600.2 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

A10G 32.51

RX 7800M 38.58
+18.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

A10G 13598
Samples: 6

RX 7800M 16134
+18.6%

Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.51	38.58
Recency	12 April 2021	11 September 2024
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	180 Watt

A10G has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 7800M, on the other hand, has a 18.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800M is our recommended choice as it beats the A10G in performance tests.

Be aware that A10G is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook one.