A40 PCIe vs Radeon RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 32GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)5 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384010752
Core clock speed1295 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate560.4589.7
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs96112
TMUs240336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Cores6084
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB6 MB
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1812 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s695.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2024 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 300 Watt

RX 7800M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

A40 PCIe, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and A40 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while A40 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
NVIDIA A40 PCIe
A40 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 89 votes

Rate A40 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or A40 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.