Radeon Pro V620 vs A10G

Place in the ranking	73	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.24	12.53
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA102	Navi 21
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	4 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9216	4608
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	492.5	633.6
Floating-point processing power	31.52 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	128
TMUs	288	288
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1563 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	600.2 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	8.6	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

A10G 41.87

Pro V620 47.20
+12.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

A10G 18723

Pro V620 21105
+12.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.87	47.20
Recency	12 April 2021	4 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	300 Watt

A10G has 100% lower power consumption.

Pro V620, on the other hand, has a 12.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro V620 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10G in performance tests.