GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs A100 SXM4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.96
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)6 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69122560
Core clock speed1410 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate609.1no data
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPSno data
ROPs160no data
TMUs432no data
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount40 GB6 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.140-
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 60 Watt

A100 SXM4 has a 566.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 611 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.