ATI Radeon IGP 330M vs ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameRage Pro TurboRS200
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 1997 (27 years ago)1 May 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed75 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors8 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate0.080.37
ROPs12
TMUs12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed75 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth600 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DB13W3No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.07.0
OpenGL1.11.4
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 1 May 2002
Chip lithography 350 nm 180 nm

ATI IGP 330M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 94.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI and Radeon IGP 330M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop card while Radeon IGP 330M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
ATI Radeon IGP 330M
Radeon IGP 330M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.