GeForce4 MX 420 vs ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRage LTNV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 1997 (27 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed75 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors8 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.081.000
ROPs12
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSDR
Maximum RAM amount8 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth800 MB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.08.0
OpenGL1.11.3
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1997 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 150 nm

GeForce4 MX 420 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage LT PRO AGP and GeForce4 MX 420. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce4 MX 420

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 23 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.