Radeon RX 9050 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs with Radeon RX 9050, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs
2021
2.10

RX 9050 outperforms Graphics 16EUs by a whopping 1062% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking940264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.66
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (5 years ago)28 July 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed350 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data92 Watt
Texture fill rateno data166.4
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.9
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11120−130
+991%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 7 80−85
+1043%
Counter-Strike 2 23 260−270
+1030%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 45−50
+1025%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 5−6 55−60
+1000%
Battlefield 5 10 110−120
+1000%
Counter-Strike 2 17 190−200
+1018%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 45−50
+1025%
Far Cry 5 8 90−95
+1025%
Fortnite 10−11 110−120
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 120−130
+991%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 130−140
+983%
Valorant 40−45 450−500
+998%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 5−6 55−60
+1000%
Battlefield 5 6−7 65−70
+983%
Counter-Strike 2 5 55−60
+1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 450−500
+947%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 45−50
+1025%
Far Cry 5 7 80−85
+1043%
Far Cry 6 3−4 30−33
+900%
Fortnite 10−11 110−120
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 120−130
+991%
Grand Theft Auto V 6 65−70
+983%
Metro Exodus 3−4 30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 130−140
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 100−105
+1011%
Valorant 40−45 450−500
+998%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 65−70
+983%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 45−50
+1025%
Far Cry 5 5−6 55−60
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 120−130
+991%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 130−140
+983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5 55−60
+1000%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 110−120
+1000%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 55−60
+1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 170−180
+1033%
Far Cry 6 2−3 21−24
+950%
Valorant 18−20 200−210
+1011%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4 30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 55−60
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 30−33
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 30−33
+900%

4K
High

Far Cry 6 5−6 55−60
+1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 170−180
+1033%
Valorant 10−12 120−130
+991%

4K
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 30−33
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 30−33
+900%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs and RX 9050 compete in popular games:

  • RX 9050 is 991% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 24.40
Recency 30 March 2021 28 July 2026

RX 9050 has a 1062% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Radeon RX 9050 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9050 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs or Radeon RX 9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.