Radeon Pro Vega II vs RX Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RX Vega 56 RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64 Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Liquid RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega Nano RX Vega XL RX Vega XT RX Vega XTX Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI50 Instinct MI60 Pro Vega II Pro Vega II Duo Pro VII

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 with Radeon Pro Vega II, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 64
2017, $499
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
33.06
Pro Vega II
2019, $2,199
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
37.33
+12.9%

Pro II outperforms RX Vega 64 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64
Pro Vega II Pro Vega II

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking180142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.605.48
Power efficiency8.736.12
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 August 2017 (9 years ago)3 June 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX Vega 64 has 203% better value for money than Pro Vega II.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Core clock speed1247 MHz1574 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate395.8440.3
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256256
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz806 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s825.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 64 33.06
Pro Vega II 37.33
+12.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 13830
Samples: 3507
Pro Vega II 15618
+12.9%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116130−140
+12.1%
1440p7785−90
+10.4%
4K5155−60
+7.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.30
+74.6%
16.92
1440p6.48
+75%
25.87
4K9.78
+75.5%
39.98
  • RX Vega 64 has 75% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 75% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 76% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 95−100 110−120
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 210−220
+11.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 85−90
+10.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90 95−100
+9.2%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 95−100 110−120
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 161 180−190
+11.8%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 210−220
+11.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 85−90
+10.4%
Far Cry 5 110 120−130
+9.1%
Fortnite 150−160 160−170
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 167 180−190
+7.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 150−160
+11.1%
Valorant 315 350−400
+11.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 95−100 110−120
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 146 160−170
+9.6%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 210−220
+11.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 85−90
+10.4%
Dota 2 150 160−170
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 104 110−120
+5.8%
Fortnite 150−160 160−170
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 158 170−180
+7.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 130−140
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 73 80−85
+9.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 150−160
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132 140−150
+6.1%
Valorant 293 300−310
+2.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 139 150−160
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 85−90
+10.4%
Dota 2 138 150−160
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 98 110−120
+12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 128 140−150
+9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 150−160
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77 85−90
+10.4%
Valorant 140 150−160
+7.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 160−170
+6.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 90−95
+11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 260−270
+10.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 75−80
+10.3%
Metro Exodus 46 50−55
+8.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 263 290−300
+10.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 100−105
+12.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 81 90−95
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 98 110−120
+12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 65−70
+6.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 95−100
+9.2%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30 30−33
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 75−80
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 46 50−55
+8.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 50−55
+4.2%
Valorant 205 230−240
+12.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 59 65−70
+10.2%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 18−20
+5.9%
Dota 2 96 100−105
+4.2%
Far Cry 5 44 45−50
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 66 70−75
+6.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 45−50
+7.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 45−50
+9.8%

This is how RX Vega 64 and Pro Vega II compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega II is 12% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega II is 10% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega II is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.06 37.33
Recency 7 August 2017 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 475 Watt

RX Vega 64 has 38% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 LE
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
vs
Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile
vs
W5130M W5130M
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
Instinct MI25 Instinct MI25
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
Instinct MI25 Instinct MI25
vs
RTX 5050 RTX 5050
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
ATI X1950 PRO X1950 PRO
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 610
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce MX130 MX130
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1070 Ti
vs
R9 285 R9 285

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 892 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 81 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 or Radeon Pro Vega II, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.