GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6800
2020, $579
16 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
52.95
RTX 4060 Ti
2023, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
54.23
+2.4%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms RX 6800 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6458
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.0378.95
Power efficiency16.4226.27
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)18 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4060 Ti has 102% better value for money than RX 6800.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404352
Core clock speed1700 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate505.2344.8
Floating-point processing power16.17 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs240136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Cores6034
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KB4.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB32 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800 52.95
RTX 4060 Ti 54.23
+2.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 22059
Samples: 4966
RTX 4060 Ti 22594
+2.4%
Samples: 15789

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD175
+2.9%
170−180
1440p102
+2%
100−110
4K62
+3.3%
60−65

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.312.35
+29.1%
1440p5.683.99
+29.7%
4K9.346.65
+28.8%
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 29% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 30% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 29% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 262
+0.8%
260−270
Counter-Strike 2 350 350−400
Cyberpunk 2077 135
+3.8%
130−140
Resident Evil 4 Remake 322
+7.3%
300−310

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 198 200−210
+1%
Battlefield 5 150−160 160−170
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 349 350−400
+0.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 115
+4.5%
110−120
Far Cry 5 197 200−210
+1.5%
Fortnite 230−240
+1.7%
230−240
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+2.5%
200−210
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
Valorant 300−350
+1.3%
300−310

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 120 120−130
Battlefield 5 150−160 160−170
+1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 259 260−270
+0.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 280−290
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
+4%
100−105
Dota 2 145
+3.6%
140−150
Far Cry 5 186 190−200
+2.2%
Fortnite 230−240
+1.7%
230−240
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+2.5%
200−210
Grand Theft Auto V 159 160−170
+0.6%
Metro Exodus 147 150−160
+2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 269 270−280
+0.4%
Valorant 300−350
+1.3%
300−310

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160 160−170
+1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 99 100−105
+1%
Dota 2 128 130−140
+1.6%
Far Cry 5 174
+2.4%
170−180
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+2.5%
200−210
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+1.3%
150−160
Valorant 300−350
+1.3%
300−310

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240
+1.7%
230−240

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 175
+2.9%
170−180
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 400−450
+2.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+4.2%
120−130
Metro Exodus 89 90−95
+1.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 74 75−80
+1.4%
Far Cry 5 163
+1.9%
160−170
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 170−180
+1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 120−130
+1.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 150−160
+1.4%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 45−50 45−50
Counter-Strike 2 47
+4.4%
45−50
Grand Theft Auto V 132
+1.5%
130−140
Metro Exodus 55 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99 100−105
+1%
Valorant 300−350
+2.3%
300−310

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+13.3%
30−33
Dota 2 102
+2%
100−105
Far Cry 5 91
+1.1%
90−95
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 120−130
+0.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+2.2%
90−95

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+4%
75−80

This is how RX 6800 and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.95 54.23
Recency 28 October 2020 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 160 Watt

RX 6800 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6800 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2454 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13252 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.