Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs RX 6750 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6750 XT
2022, $549
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
49.46
+5.1%

6750 XT outperforms 9060 XT 8 GB by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6980
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.9195.48
Power efficiency15.4124.43
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 22Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2022 (4 years ago)4 June 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 108% better value for money than RX 6750 XT.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed2150 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate416.0400.6
Floating-point processing power13.31 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160128
Ray Tracing Cores4032
L0 Cache640 KB512 KB
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache3 MB4 MB
L3 Cache96 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6750 XT 49.46
+5.1%
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 47.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20695
+5.1%
Samples: 5787
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 19690
Samples: 1241

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD163
+8.7%
150−160
1440p88
+10%
80−85
4K50
+11.1%
45−50

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.371.99
+40.8%
1440p6.243.74
+40.1%
4K10.986.64
+39.5%
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 41% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 40% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 39% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 245
+6.5%
230−240
Counter-Strike 2 353
+17.7%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+10%
150−160

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 176
+10%
160−170
Battlefield 5 150−160
+9.3%
140−150
Counter-Strike 2 346
+15.3%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+5.8%
120−130
Far Cry 5 178
+11.3%
160−170
Fortnite 210−220
+8%
200−210
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6.7%
180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+7.5%
160−170
Valorant 280−290
+5.9%
270−280

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 104
+9.5%
95−100
Battlefield 5 150−160
+9.3%
140−150
Counter-Strike 2 220
+10%
200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+6.9%
260−270
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+9%
100−105
Dota 2 154
+10%
140−150
Far Cry 5 170
+6.3%
160−170
Far Cry 6 130
+8.3%
120−130
Fortnite 210−220
+8%
200−210
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6.7%
180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+8%
150−160
Metro Exodus 127
+5.8%
120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+7.5%
160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
+6.5%
230−240
Valorant 280−290
+5.9%
270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+9.3%
140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+8.9%
90−95
Dota 2 131
+9.2%
120−130
Far Cry 5 158
+5.3%
150−160
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+6.7%
180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+7.5%
160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+12.5%
120−130
Valorant 280−290
+5.9%
270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+8%
200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126
+14.5%
110−120
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+20.3%
300−310
Far Cry 6 101
+6.3%
95−100
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+6%
100−105
Metro Exodus 76
+8.6%
70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+9.4%
160−170
Valorant 300−350
+9.3%
300−310

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+11.8%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+9.1%
55−60
Far Cry 5 141
+8.5%
130−140
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+10%
140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+7%
100−105

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+6.2%
130−140

4K
High

Atomic Heart 40−45
+20%
35−40
Counter-Strike 2 33
+10%
30−33
Far Cry 6 55
+10%
50−55
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+9.5%
95−100
Metro Exodus 47
+17.5%
40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+5.3%
75−80
Valorant 290−300
+6.1%
280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+8.3%
24−27
Dota 2 101
+6.3%
95−100
Far Cry 5 78
+11.4%
70−75
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+7%
100−105
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+9.3%
75−80

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+10.8%
65−70

This is how RX 6750 XT and RX 9060 XT 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 9% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 10% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.46 47.06
Recency 3 March 2022 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

RX 6750 XT has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6750 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3356 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 500 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6750 XT or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.