Rubin Ultra GPU vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameAD104GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512057344
Core clock speed1725 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate360.04,062.5
Floating-point processing power23.04 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs1601792
Tensor Cores1601792
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache5 MB112 MB
L2 Cache48 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
WidthIGPSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.910.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 3600 Watt

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation has 3500% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 8433% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.