Rubin Ultra GPU vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameAD103GR110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores972857344
Core clock speed930 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate510.74,062.5
Floating-point processing power32.69 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs11224
TMUs3041792
Tensor Cores3041792
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MB112 MB
L2 Cache64 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.910.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 3600 Watt

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 2900% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.