Rubin Ultra GPU vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.86no data
Power efficiency44.95no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameAD107GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 February 2024 (2 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores281657344
Core clock speed1620 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2130 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate187.44,062.5
Floating-point processing power12 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs4824
TMUs881792
Tensor Cores881792
Ray Tracing Cores22no data
L1 Cache2.8 MB112 MB
L2 Cache12 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 6.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.910.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 3600 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 5043% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 100 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Ada Generation or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.