Tesla P40 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile with Tesla P40, including specs and performance data.
P40 outperforms 1060 Mobile by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 347 | 233 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.23 | 1.02 |
| Power efficiency | 17.35 | 8.61 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GP106 | GP102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 13 September 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | $5,699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
GTX 1060 Mobile has 903% better value for money than Tesla P40.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 million | 11,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 | 367.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.275 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 96 |
| TMUs | 80 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 8-pin EPS |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1808 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 347.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDCP | 2.2 | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GameStream | + | - |
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | no data |
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Ansel | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 68
−47.1%
| 100−110
+47.1%
|
| 1440p | 45
−44.4%
| 65−70
+44.4%
|
| 4K | 30
−50%
| 45−50
+50%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 3.49
+1534%
| 56.99
−1534%
|
| 1440p | 5.27
+1564%
| 87.68
−1564%
|
| 4K | 7.90
+1502%
| 126.64
−1502%
|
- GTX 1060 Mobile has 1534% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- GTX 1060 Mobile has 1564% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- GTX 1060 Mobile has 1502% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 137
−53.3%
|
210−220
+53.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 37
−48.6%
|
55−60
+48.6%
|
| Palworld | 40−45
−51.2%
|
65−70
+51.2%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 47
−48.9%
|
70−75
+48.9%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 96
−45.8%
|
140−150
+45.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110
−54.5%
|
170−180
+54.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30
−50%
|
45−50
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75
−46.7%
|
110−120
+46.7%
|
| Fortnite | 177
−52.5%
|
270−280
+52.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 102
−47.1%
|
150−160
+47.1%
|
| Palworld | 40−45
−51.2%
|
65−70
+51.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 78
−53.8%
|
120−130
+53.8%
|
| Valorant | 136
−54.4%
|
210−220
+54.4%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 81
−48.1%
|
120−130
+48.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 73
−50.7%
|
110−120
+50.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 222
−35.1%
|
300−310
+35.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
−50.9%
|
160−170
+50.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 68
−47.1%
|
100−105
+47.1%
|
| Fortnite | 105
−52.4%
|
160−170
+52.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 91
−53.8%
|
140−150
+53.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 74
−48.6%
|
110−120
+48.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40
−50%
|
60−65
+50%
|
| Palworld | 40−45
−51.2%
|
65−70
+51.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 67
−49.3%
|
100−105
+49.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 69
−44.9%
|
100−105
+44.9%
|
| Valorant | 134
−49.3%
|
200−210
+49.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 71
−54.9%
|
110−120
+54.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 23
−52.2%
|
35−40
+52.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 118
−52.5%
|
180−190
+52.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 64
−48.4%
|
95−100
+48.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 71
−54.9%
|
110−120
+54.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 52
−53.8%
|
80−85
+53.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 39
−53.8%
|
60−65
+53.8%
|
| Valorant | 72
−52.8%
|
110−120
+52.8%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 81
−48.1%
|
120−130
+48.1%
|
| Palworld | 40−45
−51.2%
|
65−70
+51.2%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
−48.6%
|
55−60
+48.6%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
−50.4%
|
200−210
+50.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−45.2%
|
45−50
+45.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 23
−52.2%
|
35−40
+52.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
−52.4%
|
250−260
+52.4%
|
| Valorant | 133
−50.4%
|
200−210
+50.4%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 53
−50.9%
|
80−85
+50.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 43
−51.2%
|
65−70
+51.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 57
−49.1%
|
85−90
+49.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−48.1%
|
40−45
+48.1%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 50
−50%
|
75−80
+50%
|
| Palworld | 24−27
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−50%
|
24−27
+50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−51.5%
|
50−55
+51.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14
−50%
|
21−24
+50%
|
| Palworld | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
−53.8%
|
40−45
+53.8%
|
| Valorant | 117
−53.8%
|
180−190
+53.8%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 28
−42.9%
|
40−45
+42.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−50%
|
24−27
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
−50.8%
|
95−100
+50.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21
−42.9%
|
30−33
+42.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35
−42.9%
|
50−55
+42.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 17
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 23
−52.2%
|
35−40
+52.2%
|
| Palworld | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and Tesla P40 compete in popular games:
- Tesla P40 is 47% faster in 1080p
- Tesla P40 is 44% faster in 1440p
- Tesla P40 is 50% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.94 | 27.83 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 24 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
GTX 1060 Mobile has 213% lower power consumption.
Tesla P40, on the other hand, has a 55% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The Tesla P40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
