Arc B370 vs Arc A550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A550M and Arc B370, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A550M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.69
+11%

A550M outperforms B370 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking280311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.2563.25
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameDG2-512Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2022 (4 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate262.496.00
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs12840
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores1610
L1 Cache3 MB640 KB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+18.2%
110−120
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Palworld 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+15%
80−85
−15%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+18.2%
110−120
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Fortnite 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+15%
80−85
−15%
Palworld 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+12.5%
80−85
−12.5%
Valorant 160−170
+15%
140−150
−15%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+15%
80−85
−15%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+18.2%
110−120
−18.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+15%
220−230
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Dota 2 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Fortnite 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+15%
80−85
−15%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+12%
75−80
−12%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Palworld 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+12.5%
80−85
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Valorant 160−170
+15%
140−150
−15%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+15%
80−85
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Dota 2 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+15%
80−85
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+12.5%
80−85
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Valorant 160−170
+15%
140−150
−15%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%
Palworld 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+17.1%
140−150
−17.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16%
150−160
−16%
Valorant 180−190
+11.2%
170−180
−11.2%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Palworld 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Palworld 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Valorant 120−130
+15.5%
110−120
−15.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Dota 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Palworld 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.69 20.44
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 25 Watt

Arc A550M has a 11% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc B370, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc B370 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 102 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 6 votes

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A550M or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.