EPYC 7343 vs Xeon X7560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X7560
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.30
EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.46
+437%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Xeon X7560 by a whopping 437% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1200174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.21
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency3.7213.66
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.27 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache24 MB L3 Cache128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCBGA1567,FCLGA1567SP3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X7560 5.30
EPYC 7343 28.46
+437%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X7560 8110
EPYC 7343 43561
+437%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.30 28.46
Recency 1 January 2010 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 190 Watt

Xeon X7560 has 46.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has a 437% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X7560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7560 and EPYC 7343, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X7560
Xeon X7560
AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13 votes

Rate Xeon X7560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X7560 or EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.