Xeon E-2334 vs X7550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X7550
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.09

E-2334 outperforms X7550 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1144854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.294.14
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataRocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)8 September 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$2291 $2748

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2334 has 1328% better value for money than Xeon X7550.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache18 MB L3 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA1567FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X7550 5.09
Xeon E-2334 8.36
+64.2%

E-2334 outperforms X7550 by 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X7550 7873
Xeon E-2334 12929
+64.2%

E-2334 outperforms X7550 by 64% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.09 8.36
Recency 1 January 2010 8 September 2021
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E-2334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X7550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7550 and Xeon E-2334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X7550
Xeon X7550
Intel Xeon E-2334
Xeon E-2334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Xeon E-2334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X7550 or Xeon E-2334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.