i3-10100F vs Xeon X7550

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X7550
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.14
Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.72
+11.3%

Core i3-10100F outperforms Xeon X7550 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12201145
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.22
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.618.02
Architecture codenameno dataComet Lake (2020)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)12 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache18 MB L3 Cache6 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA1567FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X7550 5.14
i3-10100F 5.72
+11.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X7550 7873
i3-10100F 8759
+11.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.14 5.72
Recency 1 January 2010 12 October 2020
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon X7550 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-10100F, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X7550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X7550 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-10100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7550 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X7550
Xeon X7550
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7544 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X7550 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.