E1-1500 vs Xeon X5687

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and E1-1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1564not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.48no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.43no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and E1-1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz1.48 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size239 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and E1-1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and E1-1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and E1-1500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and E1-1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and E1-1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and E1-1500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5687 5309
+1234%
E1-1500 398

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2011 6 January 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon X5687 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

E1-1500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 622.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5687 and E1-1500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5687 is a server/workstation processor while E1-1500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and E1-1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
AMD E1-1500
E1-1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 160 votes

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or E1-1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.