Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Xeon X5675

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03
+1051%
Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35

Xeon X5675 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by a whopping 1051% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14213060
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.08no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency4.013.31
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.06 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.03
+1051%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 0.35

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5675 502
+194%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 171

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5675 2464
+747%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 291

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 0.35
Recency 14 February 2011 1 September 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 1051.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo SU7300, on the other hand, has 850% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SU7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo SU7300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Duo SU7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 635 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Core 2 Duo SU7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.