Xeon Gold 6238 vs X5670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.94
Xeon Gold 6238
2019
22 cores / 44 threads, 140 Watt
18.53
+370%

Gold 6238 outperforms X5670 by a whopping 370% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1373295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0611.21
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)Intel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67$2,612
Current price$44 (0.7x MSRP)$1883 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6238 has 958% better value for money than Xeon X5670.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads1244
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support6400 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.375 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)22 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)30.25 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °C92 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size288 GB1 TB
Max memory channels36
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5670 3.94
Xeon Gold 6238 18.53
+370%

Gold 6238 outperforms X5670 by 370% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5670 6089
Xeon Gold 6238 28668
+371%

Gold 6238 outperforms X5670 by 371% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.94 18.53
Recency 16 March 2010 2 April 2019
Physical cores 6 22
Threads 12 44
Cost $67 $2612
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 140 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6238 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and Xeon Gold 6238, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670
Intel Xeon Gold 6238
Xeon Gold 6238

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 465 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6238 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5670 or Xeon Gold 6238, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.