Celeron N2830 vs Xeon X5667

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5667
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.93
+762%
Celeron N2830
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.34

Xeon X5667 outperforms Celeron N2830 by a whopping 762% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16493055
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.924.60
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.41 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature83 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5667 2.93
+762%
Celeron N2830 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5667 4659
+750%
Celeron N2830 548

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5667 569
+245%
Celeron N2830 165

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5667 2426
+773%
Celeron N2830 278

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.93 0.34
Recency 16 March 2010 23 February 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 7 Watt

Xeon X5667 has a 761.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N2830, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1257.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5667 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5667 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2830 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5667 and Celeron N2830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5667
Xeon X5667
Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 9 votes

Rate Xeon X5667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 238 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5667 or Celeron N2830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.