Atom N270 vs Xeon X5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5650 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1475not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53$44

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5650 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.66 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5650 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5650 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X5650 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5650 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5650 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GB8 GB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5650 and Atom N270.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5650 5715
+4102%
Atom N270 136

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 2 April 2008
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon X5650 has an age advantage of 1 year, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 4650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5650 and Atom N270. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5650 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5650 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 445 votes

Rate Xeon X5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 222 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5650 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.